4 posts by kevin-perez

Ruby 2.7 introduced numbered parameters for blocks

Since Ruby 2.7, it is possible to use numbered parameters in blocks additionally to named parameters.

This is an example of a block with named parameters:

my_array.each { |element| element.do_something }

And this is the same line with numbered parameters:

my_array.each { _1.do_something }

This works with multiple parameters too:

# named parameters
my_hash.each_pair { |key, value| puts "#{key}: #{value}" }

# numered parameters
my_hash.each_pair { puts "#{_1}: #{_2}" }

Learned by kevin-perez on Mar 30, 2021

973983 adforcodereview v3 0211021 c02 021121

If you're having issues installing gems...

...try running rm -rf vendor/cache inside your app's root directory. Looks like sometimes cache can cause compilation issues while building gem extensions so getting rid of it fixes the issue. I can't guarantee this works 100% of the time, but it's worth giving a try if it can help you avoid a headache.

Learned by kevin-perez on Mar 29, 2021

973983 adforcodereview v3 0211021 c02 021121

Testing and sharing simple SQL queries online

If you want to test and share a simple SQL query, take a look at http://sqlize.com. Keep in mind you'll need to create the tables you need in the same script and you're only allowed to create TEMPORARY tables. You can run your query and see the results below it right away. Then, you can generate a permalink and share your query with everyone!

Learned by kevin-perez on Mar 10, 2021

973983 adforcodereview v3 0211021 c02 021121

Beware of calling #count on Active Record relations!

Given code like this:

records = Record.includes(:related).all # Eager-loads to prevent N+1 queries...
records.each do |record|
  puts record.related.count # => ... but this produces N+1 queries anyway!

If you run this, you'll notice you get an N+1 queries problem, even though we're using #includes. This happens because of record.related.count. Remember, records.related here is not an Array but an instance of CollectionProxy and its #count method always reaches out to the database. Use #length or #size instead to solve this issue.

records = Record.includes(:related).all
records.each do |record|
  puts record.related.length # Problem solved!

Learned by kevin-perez on Feb 18, 2021

973983 adforcodereview v3 0211021 c02 021121